Cambridge Governance Labs

The State of
Global Liberty
2025

A quantitative assessment of democratic health across 91 countries, 225 years, and 1,656 observations
Political Topology Project
Data: Freedom House · V-Dem · Fragile States Index · World Bank · UNDP · IMF
February 2026
Executive Summary

The Global Picture at a Glance

48
Global Mean
Liberty Score
34%
Countries
Rated "Free"
19
Consecutive Years
of Decline
3.0%
Recovery Rate
Below Event Horizon
60
Countries Below
Event Horizon

The world is in its nineteenth consecutive year of democratic decline. The global mean Liberty score stands at 48 out of 100 — meaning the average country on earth is more unfree than free. Only 34% of the 91 countries in the Political Topology dataset qualify as "Free," while 41 are classified as "Not Free."

The decline is not confined to fragile states or post-colonial nations. Established democracies — including the United States, India, and Israel — are eroding at rates not seen in their modern histories. The V-Dem Institute reclassified the United States as an "electoral autocracy" in September 2025, the most significant downgrade of a major democracy since V-Dem's founding.

Political regimes are not points on a spectrum but positions in a phase space governed by attractor dynamics. Once a polity crosses an event horizon of institutional capture, the probability of self-correction falls below 3%.

This report presents the Political Topology framework's assessment of where the world stands, how it got here, and what the trajectory data suggests about where it is heading.

Historical Context

225 Years of Political Freedom: Six Snapshots

The arc of political freedom is not, as commonly assumed, a steady upward march. The 225-year record reveals waves, reversals, and long plateaus. The current moment is the deepest reversal since the end of the Cold War.

political-topology-225-years
Regional Analysis

Seven Worlds: Regional Liberty Profiles

RegionCountriesMean LibertyMean HCICorrelation (L×HCI)% Free & CapableTrend
Europe2382910.78596%Mixed
Americas1258780.64242%Declining
Asia-Pacific1547760.53427%Mixed
Sub-Saharan Africa1538620.51213%Declining
Middle East & N. Africa1022830.2980%Stagnant
Eurasia & Central Asia814750.2680%Declining
South Asia842650.47113%Declining

Europe: Strongest but Fracturing

Europe remains the world's freest region (mean L=82), with the strongest correlation between liberty and capability (r=0.785). But fracture lines are visible: Hungary (L=52) anchors the low end, with Poland's recovery (L=82) demonstrating that reversal is possible when political will exists. 22 of 23 European countries qualify as "Free and Capable."

MENA: Capable but Unfree

The Middle East has the largest gap between capability and freedom. Mean HCI of 83 with mean Liberty of only 22 — a gap of +61 points. Saudi Arabia (HCI 89, L=7) represents the extreme: a wealthy, educated population living under near-total political control. Zero countries in the region qualify as Free.

Americas: The US Pulls the Average Down

The Western Hemisphere's decline is driven substantially by the United States, the region's largest country. Excluding the US, the Americas show mixed performance: Costa Rica, Uruguay, and Chile maintain strong scores, while Venezuela (L=8), Nicaragua, and Cuba anchor the bottom.

Eurasia: Deepest Autocratic Basin

Eurasia is home to 8 of the world's "Capable Autocracies" — states that deliver material welfare without political freedom. Russia (L=13), China (L=5), and the Central Asian states form a block of stable, high-capability authoritarianism. The regional correlation between liberty and capability is just 0.268 — the weakest anywhere.

Dynamics

The Velocity of Decline

Not all decline is created equal. Some countries erode slowly over decades; others collapse in years. The velocity of liberty change — measured as the annualized change in Liberty score — reveals which countries are moving fastest.

Fastest Decliners (2010–2025)

CountryVelocityL (2010)L (2025)
United States−3.1/yr9448
Turkey−2.3/yr5518
Nicaragua−2.0/yr4818
Hungary−1.8/yr8952
India−1.5/yr7762
Israel−0.7/yr8060

Fastest Risers (2010–2025)

CountryVelocityL (2010)L (2025)
Armenia+1.1/yr4864
Taiwan+0.6/yr8392
The Gambia+0.5/yr2230
Ecuador+0.4/yr5662
Key finding: 67 of 91 countries (74%) are in negative velocity territory. The risers are outnumbered and outpaced. The ratio of decliners to improvers is approximately 3:1.

The United States stands out as the fastest-declining consolidated democracy in the dataset. Its velocity of −3.1 points per year over 15 years is unprecedented for a country that was rated above 90 at the start of the period. No other established democracy — defined as having maintained L≥80 for at least 25 years — has ever declined this rapidly without a military coup or foreign invasion.

Framework

The Tristable Basin Model

The Political Topology framework models political systems not as positions on a linear spectrum but as particles in a three-basin potential landscape. Like a marble on a contoured surface, countries tend to settle into one of three attractor states.

The Three Basins

Democratic Plateau (L > 80)

Deep, stable basin. Self-reinforcing via institutional redundancy. 31 countries currently reside here. Recovery from perturbation: ~82%. Examples: Finland (L=100), Norway, New Zealand, Canada.

Hybrid Trap (L = 20–70)

Shallow, unstable basin. Maximum volatility zone. 32 countries here. Countries can tip towards either democracy or tyranny. Examples: Hungary (52), India (62), Mexico (60), Nigeria (43).

Tyranny Well (L < 20)

Deepest basin. Near-impossible escape once fully settled. 28 countries. Recovery rate: ~3% (95% CI: 0.7–6.0%). Examples: China (5), Russia (13), Saudi Arabia (7), North Korea (2).

The Event Horizon

At Liberty scores of approximately 52–55, the framework identifies a Critical Instability Zone — a threshold below which self-correction becomes extremely unlikely. Three independent estimation methods (survival analysis, Markov transition matrices, and potential function estimation) converge on this range.

Below this threshold:

  • Recovery probability: 3.0% (95% CI: 0.7–6.0%)
  • Median time to further decline: 4.2 years
  • Institutional self-repair mechanisms largely disabled

Currently, 60 of 91 countries in the dataset (66%) sit below this event horizon. Eight countries that were above it in 2010 have since crossed below it.

Critical: Once the event horizon is crossed, external intervention (international pressure, civil society mobilisation, or economic crisis forcing elite realignment) becomes the primary path back. Internal institutional correction alone succeeds in fewer than 1 in 30 cases.
Country Spotlights

Five Countries to Watch

United States: The Fast Collapse

L=48 (PTI) | Velocity: −3.1/yr | Stage 5: Electoral Autocracy

The most dramatic case in the dataset. After 220 years of steady improvement (L=42 in 1800 to L=94 in 2015), the US experienced a −46 point decline in approximately five years. V-Dem reclassified it as an "electoral autocracy" in September 2025. The TCF Democracy Metre independently scored it at 57.

Note: Published indices (Freedom House 83, V-Dem ~65-72 scaled) diverge from the PTI's real-time assessment. The credible range is 48–84, with the truth likely in the 57–70 zone. Even at the most generous reading, the US is the fastest-declining consolidated democracy on record.

India: The Silent Erosion

L=62 | Velocity: −1.5/yr | Stage 4: Competitive Authoritarianism

The world's largest democracy has been downgraded to "electoral autocracy" by V-Dem since 2017. Press freedom severely constrained. Muslim minority rights systematically curtailed. Yet India's trajectory receives far less attention than the US because the erosion has been gradual, spread across multiple institutional fronts, and accompanied by strong economic growth.

Hungary: The Canonical Slow Death

L=52 | Velocity: −1.8/yr | Stage 5-6: Soft Dictatorship

Viktor Orbán's 15-year project represents the textbook case of incremental democratic erosion. From L=89 to L=52 without a single coup, revolution, or declaration of emergency. Each step — media capture, judicial packing, electoral gerrymandering, constitutional amendment — was individually defensible. Collectively, they dismantled Hungarian democracy.

Poland: The Recovery Case

L=82 | Velocity: +0.8/yr (since 2023) | Stage 2: Early Warning

After 8 years of PiS-led erosion, Poland's 2023 election brought the Tusk coalition to power. The recovery demonstrates that democratic backsliding can be reversed if intervention comes before the event horizon is crossed. Remaining challenge: President Nawrocki creates cohabitation tension.

El Salvador: Security for Freedom

L=35 | Velocity: −2.5/yr | Stage 6-7

President Bukele trades freedom for security with 91% public approval. 83,000+ imprisoned under state-of-exception. Term limits abolished July 2025. Demonstrates that democratic erosion can be popular when the alternative is perceived as intolerable violence.

Distribution

Where the World's Countries Stand

Liberty BandClassificationCount% of TotalNotable Countries
85–100Consolidated Democracy1820%Finland, Norway, New Zealand, Denmark, Taiwan
70–84Flawed Democracy1314%France, Poland, South Korea, Japan, Chile
55–69Hybrid / Eroding1415%India, Mexico, Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa
40–54Electoral Autocracy1112%Hungary, United States (PTI), Nigeria, Pakistan
20–39Soft Dictatorship1213%Turkey, Egypt, Morocco, Venezuela, El Salvador
0–19Closed Autocracy2325%China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, N. Korea
Population-weighted perspective: When weighted by population, the picture is even starker. 71% of the world's population lives in countries classified as "Not Free." China and India alone account for 36% of global population, and both are in decline, or stagnation on the Liberty axis. Free and democratic countries increasingly represent a minority of humanity.

The Capable Autocracies Problem

A critical finding of the Political Topology project is the emergence of 39 "Capable Autocracies" — states that combine high human capability (HCI ≥ 70) with low political freedom (L < 60). These states deliver healthcare, education, infrastructure, and material living standards comparable to, or exceeding many democracies, but without political lliberalisation.

The correlation between liberty and human capability has fallen from r = 0.79 (pre-1900) to r = 0.57 (post-1990). This "Great Decoupling" undermines the traditional assumption that economic development inevitably leads to political opening. The autocrat's bargain — material welfare in exchange for political quiescence — now works in purely material terms.

Forward Look

What to Watch: Ten Indicators for 2026–2030

#IndicatorWhat It MeansCurrent Signal
1US institutional resilienceCan courts, military, and Fed maintain independence?Deteriorating
2European far-right trajectoryDo AfD, RN, FdI consolidate, or moderate?Uncertain
3India press freedomFurther suppression or sstabilisation?Deteriorating
4V-Dem 2026 reportHow many countries reclassified?Pending
5Sovereign yield repricingDo bond markets begin pricing governance risk?Asleep
6AI and information controlDoes AI enable more effective censorship/surveillance?Escalating
7Climate-driven instabilityDoes climate stress push fragile states towards chaos?Rising
8Taiwan Strait statusDoes security competition override democratic norms?Stable
9Electoral cycles 2026-27Germany, Brazil, and others — erosion or recovery?Pending
10Dollar reserve statusDoes de-dollarisation erode the yield premium that masks US risk?Early signs

The Bottom Line

Conclusion: The global democratic recession is now in its nineteenth year and shows no signs of reversal. The decline is no longer confined to fragile states — it has reached the world's largest and most influential democracies. The emergence of capable autocracies means that the material case for democracy has weakened, even as the moral, and civic case remains as strong as ever. Early detection and intervention — before countries cross the event horizon — is the only strategy with a meaningful historical success rate.

The data are clear: once institutional erosion reaches a critical threshold, recovery becomes statistically improbable. The window for action narrows every year. The question is not whether the world is becoming less free — it is — but whether the remaining democracies will rrecognise the pattern in time to reverse it.